What went into transforming IBL from the league that almost didn't make it to one of the success stories |
The
smile on Chadha’s face betrays the relief at having defied the odds. The fates
of the boxing and hockey leagues, which by all accounts, went down with a
whimper, were still fresh in public memory. Sleepless nights weren’t new to him.
In the last year, he has taken at least 300 flights, he says, trying to sell an
idea that looked like reaching for the stars. It would either have to be a
grand do or a feeble die.
And still, three
days before the auctions a months ago, faced with an acute financial crunch, a
lack of sponsors and widespread skepticism, at 3 am in the night, he and his
team were still deliberating on whether to pull out. “We would have drawn
brickbats whether we withdrew or stayed”, he reasoned practically. They decided
to stick it out, and the rest, as they say, is history. Gate collections came
in at Rs 2.5 crore, with stadiums being about 90 per cent full. He has already
been sounded out for commercial contracts for the next year’s edition.
Vodafone, the title sponsor, has indicated its continuing commitment.
Star Sports' aggressive programming & dual commentary feed are some of the reasons behind IBL success |
“When the idea
was originally mooted, what the Badminton Association had in mind was on a much
smaller scale. But we agreed to come in only if it was organised on a grand
scale”, says Chaddha. A former national level player, and a veteran of sports
broadcasting, having been sports editor at Aaj Tak and the vice president of
ESPN Star Singapore, he knew that unless the league created a wave in its
launch, it was doomed. The risk was entirely his. Unlike in other sporting
leagues, where a professional agency manages it on behalf of the sports
federation, Sporty bought the entire property from the BAI, putting itself in
the firing line.
“When the idea
was originally mooted, what the Badminton Association had in mind was on a much
smaller scale. But we agreed to come in only if it was organised on a grand
scale”, says Chaddha. A former national level player, and a veteran of sports
broadcasting, having been sports editor at Aaj Tak and the vice president of
ESPN Star Singapore, he knew that unless the league created a wave in its
launch, it was doomed. The risk was entirely his. Unlike in other sporting
leagues, where a professional agency manages it on behalf of the sports
federation, Sporty bought the entire property from the BAI, putting itself in
the firing line.
But
how grand did he expect it to be? Take, for example, the broadcast production,
which was done in-house. A total of 17 cameras were used to capture the action
for the first time ever in badminton. The London Olympics used just 12. The
best badminton commentators in the world were roped in for the English
commentary. At Rs 12 crore, his broadcast production spend was up to 5 times
what a usual international badminton tournament would cost. It reaped dividends.
For the final, ESPN Star Sports, the Indian broadcaster beamed the fixture
across all its offerings in India, up from just 4 channels earlier in the
tournament. Broadcasters in every continent except Africa paid for content.
Figures that he received from YouTube showed the most hits from the US, not
traditionally a badminton crazed nation.
He
spent another Rs 16-17 crore on marketing, including the now famous “Is this
what it takes to get your attention” hoardings with Saina Nehwal in cricket
gear. “We tried to make sure that everybody, even those who did not care for
the sport, knew about the event”. The players saw money that was unheard off in
the sport earlier. “In one day, the player fraternity got richer by almost 10
crore”, says Chaddha, about the auctions which fetched Saina Rs 71 lakh and the
likes of PV Sindhu and P Kashyap, around Rs 45 lakh for a two-week tournament.
The badminton association is estimated to have gotten a fee commitment of about
50-60 crore over 10 years. “If you had to draw an analogy, you could say that
Ashish was the Lalit Modi of badminton”, says Ramya Vankina, CEO of the Mumbai
franchise, Mumbai Masters.
Bigger, Snazzier Next Year
It is
tempting to ask how the IBL will benefit Indian badminton as a whole. The fact
is that if it weren’t for the steady string of good performances returned by
the players over the last year, “we wouldn’t have been sitting here having this
chat”, in Chadha’s words. Seven Indian men feature in the top 50 rankings
globally. “Every week some news would come about India doing well. If it was
not Saina, it was Sindhu winning a bronze at the Worlds’, or Srikanth K,
winning the Thailand open”, he says. Pradeep Gandhe, vice president of the
Badminton Association of India, and himself a former international player,
explains that for any sport to get a mass following it needs a mass following.
Indian badminton had just reached that ripe level of critical mass, which the
League could feed on.
Next
year, the event will be bigger, and perhaps, snazzier. Two additional
franchises will be up on offer, and matches will be on a home and away basis,
which will automatically double the number of matches played, as well as the
duration of the event. Coach Gopichand says that cameras for line-calls and
appeals like in tennis and cricket should be introduced. More entertainment,
perhaps. What can be reasonably said is that it will be a cakewalk compared to
the efforts of year one.
Courtesy : Written by Abraham C. Mathews (matabrahamc@gmail.com ), this story was originally published on Business World site.
You can read original story here : How IBL Managed To Strike Gold Against All Odds
No comments:
Post a Comment